Current:Home > NewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -GoldenEdge Insights
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-17 09:47:33
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (122)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- SpaceX launch: Polaris Dawn crew looks to make history with civilian spacewalk
- Aaron Rodgers will make his return to the field for the Jets against the 49ers
- Body cam footage shows police throwing Tyreek Hill to ground before Dolphins opener
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Tyreek Hill’s traffic stop shows interactions with police can be about survival for Black men
- NFL Week 1 overreactions: Can Jets figure it out? Browns, Bengals in trouble
- Rachel Zoe and Husband Rodger Berman Break Up, Divorcing After 26 Years of Marriage
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- New Hampshire primary voters to pick candidates for short but intense general election campaigns
Ranking
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Johnny Gaudreau's wife reveals pregnancy with 3rd child at emotional double funeral
- Unionized Workers Making EV Batteries Downplay Politics of the Product
- Don Lemon, with a new book on faith, examines religion in politics: 'It's disturbing'
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Aaron Rodgers documentary set to stream on Netflix in December
- Arizona’s ban on transgender girls playing girls’ school team sports remains blocked, court says
- Ryan Seacrest debuts as new host of ‘Wheel of Fortune’
Recommendation
Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
Johnny Gaudreau's wife reveals pregnancy with 3rd child at emotional double funeral
Why Jenn Tran Thinks Devin Strader Was a “Bit of a Jackass Amid Maria Georgas Drama
Revisiting Taylor Swift and Kanye West's MTV VMAs Feud 15 Years Later
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Linkin Park's New Singer Emily Armstrong Responds to Criticism Over Danny Masterson Support
Tyreek Hill knee injury: What we know (and don't) about surgery mentioned in police footage
What can you do when leaders are tolerant of demeaning workplace behavior? Ask HR